Farm Losses

 In Tax

Disclaimer: LawSkills provides training for the legal industry and does not provide legal advice to members of the public. For help or guidance please seek the services of a qualified practitioner.

Farm losses are a troubling subject for the farming industry. The judgement in Ardeshir Naghshineh v HMRC [2022] EWCA Civ 19 is of huge importance for farmers making continued losses from the actual farming operation, although some of the other farm enterprises might be profitable.

The history of the case starts with the First Tier Tribunal allowing sideways loss relief claims for a farming business where losses were made for 17 years in Naghshineh v HMRC [2018] UK FTT 453 (TC). The success of the decision caused some surprise among professional advisers and indeed it was overturned in the Upper Tribunal (UT). The Court of Appeal has now upheld the UT judgement.

The judgement of 13 January 2022 comes at a time when the farming industry is going through significant change and is faced with much uncertainty. It is ironic that the findings of the case were published in the same month as the House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts report on the Environmental Land Management scheme (ELMs). The report is very negative about the work by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) so far, stating: “The Department has not established metrics or clear objectives which would allow it to measure the success of the scheme.”

It is key for farmers and farm advisers to look at the basics under the “hobby farming” rules. Where a farming business makes losses for five consecutive years, loss relief is not available in the sixth and subsequent years unless the reasonable expectation of profits test is met and demonstrated to HMRC.

FREE monthly newsletter

Wills | Probate | Trusts | Tax  | Elderly & Vulnerable Client

  • Relevant learning and development opportunities
  • News, articles and LawSkills’ services
  • Communications which help you find appropriate training in your area

An important learning point from the case is that, as soon as losses look like they will exceed five years (this could be from the original business plan or ongoing financial review), the farm business plan must be reviewed. With the move to ELMs for farmers, the ability for farmers to produce accurate business plans is difficult. However, they must persevere as business plans are essential. Not just for sideways loss relief but also to prove the farmer has a commercial approach for Inheritance Tax (IHT) reliefs such as Business Property Relief and Agricultural Property Relief.

The LawSkills Monthly Digest

Subscribe to our comprehensive Monthly Digest for insightful feedback on Wills, Probate, Trusts, Tax and Elderly & Vulnerable client matters

Not complicated to read  |  Requires no internet searching |  Simply an informative pdf emailed to your inbox including practice points & tips

Subscribe now for monthly insightful feedback on key issues.

All for only £120 + VAT per year
(£97.50 for 10+)

Lawskills Digest
Recent Posts
LawSkills Book Reviews for private client practitionersSynergy Event - September 2022