Estate planning: a new scenario for British Expats living in Italy

 In Comment

Disclaimer: LawSkills provides training for the legal industry and does not provide legal advice to members of the public. For help or guidance please seek the services of a qualified practitioner.

The impact of the EU Succession Regulation (n. 650/2012) on British nationals who have settled in ItalyEstate Planning for British Expats living in Italy

For centuries Italy has been a popular expats destination for British nationals, many of whom have summer homes there. But Italy is also home to a large number of British people who, attracted by its rich cultural heritage, beauty and lifestyle have made Italy their permanent home.

Owning a property in Italy and living there might have relevant consequences on applicable law to succession and the new conflict law rules should be taken into consideration.

The Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 (the so called “Succession Regulation” or just “SR”)

On 17 August 2015, the SR became wholly applicable among all EU members States bound by the SR.

The SR has changed the Italian connecting factor that determines the law applicable to succession being now the “habitual residence” instead of the “nationality” of the deceased (stated under Law No. 218/1995).

FREE monthly newsletter

Wills | Probate | Trusts | Tax  | Elderly & Vulnerable Client

  • Relevant learning and development opportunities
  • News, articles and LawSkills’ services
  • Communications which help you find appropriate training in your area

Therefore, the connecting factor of the Habitual Residence of the deceased at the time of death (“HR”) is the default rule, under the SR, to determine the law applicable to the entire succession. In other words, the law applicable shall govern all questions related to the succession from the start of the succession to the transfer of ownership of the assets forming part of the estate to the beneficiaries, including the administration of the estate. Furthermore, the same law shall govern the succession of all assets forming the estate despite their nature (movables or real estate) and their location.

Under article 21.1 of the SR, the law of the State in which the deceased was habitually resident at the time of death might also be the law of a ‘third state’ (so called erga omnes or universal application). If the law determined under article 21.1 is the law of a state bound by the Succession Regulation, the existence of a uniform connecting factor shall avoid any conflict of laws.

On the other hand, when the law of habitual residence is the law of a third state the Private International Law rules (PIL) of that State should be considered. If those rules provide for renvoi either to the law of a member State or to the law of a third State which would apply its own law to the succession, such renvoi should be accepted under SR.

To be or not to be a “member State”

As a result of an intensive discussion, the UK and Ireland has exercised their right not to opt-in (i.e. did not adopt the SR), but, whether UK is to be considered as a “Member State” or a “Third State” under the SR is a question still not solved. The SR does not contain a definition of “Member State” (unlike other European instruments and the SR proposal of 2009). In this respect, Recital No. 82 of the SR does not help in clarifying this issue as it indicates that the UK and Ireland are “member states”, despite these states ‘not taking part in the adoption of this Regulation and not {being} bound by it or subject to its application’. Until this problem of interpretation is solved (by the European Court of Justice) we tend to agree with those who include in the definition of Member State under the SR only the EU Member States who are bound by the SR.

Therefore, the UK shall be considered as a“Third State” and shall apply its own conflict law rules based on two different connecting factors related to the nature of the assets (real estate or movables). The succession of movables is governed by the law of “domicile”, the succession of real estate is governed by the “lex situs” (or lex rei sitate ) or the law of the location in which it is situated.

Possible Anglo-Italian scenarios

Two possible scenarios can be envisaged:

  1. British nationals habitually resident in Italy:
    • under SR (and therefore Italian) perspective, Italian law would apply to their succession as a whole;
    • underUK PIL perspective, Italian law would be applicable to the succession of immovable property located in Italy (lex rei sitae) and possibly to the succession of movable assets (provided that the deceased was not only habitually resident in Italy but also domiciled there). However, real estate located in England will be governed by English Law (lex rei sitae).

The application of not uniform connecting factors might lead to conflict of laws. A possible way to reduce uncertainty is to advise clients to make a choice of law when possible.

  1. British nationals habitually resident in UK owning a real property in Italy:
  • under SR (and therefore Italian) perspective, Italian law would apply to their succession as a whole; should UK be considered as a “Third State” its Private International Law rules ( PIL ) would be taken into account. Therefore, the renvoi to the laws of Italy for the succession of the real property located in Italy shall be accepted under SR. Any conflict of laws would be avoided.
  • The application of UK PIL would lead to the same results and any conflict of laws would be avoided.

Choice of Law

Under both scenarios the British national might wish to avoid the application of Italian law to their succession.

The Succession Regulation allows the testator of the disposition of property upon death (DoPuD) to make a choice of law. Article 22 provides that the testator can elect the law of their nationality (or the laws of one of their nationalities in case of multiple nationalities) at the time of choice or at the time of death (it will be important to clarify this point, because the choice will remain valid even if the testator loses or changes nationality).

The choice of law can be made expressly in a declaration in the form of a DoPuD or can be implied (i.e. demonstrated by the terms of such a disposition).

It is worth mentioning that in the case of a choice of law made in a DoPuD all states bound by the Succession Regulation shall apply only the substantial applicable law (i.e. PIL rules are excluded) and no renvoi shall be admissible.

The above rule applies in any case of choice of law (whatever the chosen law is i.e. the law of a member state or the law of a third state). In fact, Recital No. 57 of SR expressly provides that ‘Renvoi should, however, be excluded in situations where the deceased had made a choice of law in favour of the law of a third State’.

Now, the question to be solved is: would the third state (whose law has been chosen. e.g. UK) respect such a choice or would it apply any possible renvoi to another law provided by its PIL rules? An answer to this question should be given on a case-by-case basis, depending on the law chosen. In our opinion conflict of laws cannot be avoided in principle.

The choice of law (i.e. the professio iuris) has not been possible under UK PIL until now unless for the limited purposes of construction of the Will.

Shall the SR trigger any change in UK PIL allowing British citizens to choose their national law even in cases in which the UK PIL would lead to the application of other laws (e.g. the law of the place where the real property in located )?

One or two Wills?

Once it is possible, under SR, to choose the English /Scottish Law as governing the succession is it still advisable to make separate Wills or it is preferable to make only one Will related also to the property located in Italy?

In our opinion the best advice to clients is still to make two separate Wills even if a choice of national law is made. The reason is mostly related to practical matters. For example, a succession return must be submitted in Italy (for tax purposes) within 12 months from the date of death (related to the Italian property only if the deceased was not resident in Italy or to the whole estate if the deceased was resident in Italy). As far as the deceased was not resident in Italy an Italian Will dealing with Italian assets only would speed up the administration process allowing a timely submission of the succession return.

By Maria Grazia Antoci (lawyer in Florence – Italy – Legal4italy ) and Daniele Muritano (notary in Empoli (FI) – Italy – Legal4italy)

The LawSkills Monthly Digest

Subscribe to our comprehensive Monthly Digest for insightful feedback on Wills, Probate, Trusts, Tax and Elderly & Vulnerable client matters

Not complicated to read  |  Requires no internet searching |  Simply an informative pdf emailed to your inbox including practice points & tips

Subscribe now for monthly insightful feedback on key issues.

All for only £120 + VAT per year
(£97.50 for 10+)

Lawskills Digest
Recommended Posts
Gill Steel Blog prefOvercoming public speaking nerves